Skip to content
Eco-design of offices: designing low carbon from the very first sketch — KYTOM
Team Design

Eco-design of offices: designing low carbon from the very first sketch

Today you are making decisions about materials that will account for a significant share of your asset’s operational carbon over ten years, and the majority of commercial leases signed in 2024 now include enforceable ESG clauses. On our recent projects, we observe that mobilising life cycle analysis from the very first sketch significantly reduces embodied carbon, with no notable additional cost when the approach is framed in phase 1.

Kytom handles this scoping from end to end: carbon diagnostic, low-carbon programming, circular sourcing pooled across our 11 agencies in France and Spain, post-delivery measurement enforceable for CSRD reporting.

The method unfolds across 5 phases over 12 weeks. Three benchmarks frame your decisions: the trajectory to reduce the energy consumption of the commercial building stock by 40% by 2030 compared to the reference year, the critical review of the LCA study aligned with the ISO 14040-14044 corpus, and the normative reference frameworks for quality of use.

Here is how we turn this framework into a lever for asset value and employer brand.

01
The framework

Regulatory obligations and life cycle analysis methodology: what really binds you in the commercial sector.

For the majority of commercial projects we support in renovation or lease fit-out, the enforceable framework is not the 2020 environmental regulation but the triptych + CSRD + Article 29 of the Energy and Climate Law. This distinction changes the documentary scope and the material decisions from phase 1 onwards.

The tertiary decree imposes -40% energy consumption by 2030 and -60% by 2050 on buildings over 1,000 m². Interior fit-out now falls within the scope via CSRD obligations and Article 29 of the Energy and Climate Law. Three texts structure your compliance:

  • NF EN 15978: life cycle analysis across 5 phases (production, transport, installation, operation, end of life).
  • 2028 regulatory thresholds: the 2028 regulatory thresholds require new low-carbon construction solutions, set out in the BBCA Renovation label for existing buildings.
  • Usable floor area and quality of use standards: linked to articles R4211 to R4217 governing workplaces.

The EPDs hosted on the INIES database remain the only reference enforceable for CSRD reporting. The majority of new commercial leases now include ESG clauses. Below 300 m² outside a lease, with no CSRD commitment or targeted certification, a simplified bio-based materials scoping is generally sufficient. The full approach is justified from 500 m², or where an asset is targeting a recognised environmental certification such as HQE.

02
Your gains

Avoided carbon, controlled additional cost and improved team satisfaction

Our method produces quantifiable effects at four levels: a markedly reduced fit-out carbon footprint, contained supply costs thanks to reuse, enhanced rental value on certified assets, and significantly improved employee satisfaction.

In practice at Kytom, the rental premium linked to certification is not an automatic given. It materialises on assets in high-demand areas (Paris CBD, Lyon Part-Dieu, La Défense, tier-1 metropolises) and subject to effective certification, not merely an eco-designed approach. On secondary assets, the real lever lies elsewhere: avoided carbon enforceable for sustainability reporting, employer brand, compliance with the 2030 tertiary trajectory.

The reuse of partitions, suspended ceilings and furniture offsets the occasional additional costs of bio-based materials. Indoor air quality, handled according to our standards of comfort and workplace health, contributes to improved employee satisfaction in eco-designed spaces. Timelines remain identical to a conventional project, provided sourcing is anticipated from the programming stage.

03
When not to go for it

The three cases where full eco-design is not the right decision

Commercial honesty requires us to name the situations where our 5-phase method consumes more value than it produces.

Project under 300 m² outside a lease. Phase 1 of carbon diagnostic, life cycle analysis and verified environmental product declarations absorbs a large share of the consulting budget on these formats. The carbon ROI remains low. We recommend a lighter approach centred on bio-based materials and furniture reuse, without enforceable reporting.

Asset not intended for certification, outside a high-demand area. The rental value lever does not hold up in our field feedback. Focus the effort on carbon enforceable for CSRD and on employer brand, and calibrate the budget accordingly.

Compressed schedule under 8 weeks. Circular sourcing pooled across our 11 agencies in France and Spain requires lead time. Forcing the schedule degrades the reuse rate and cancels out the carbon advantage. In that case, prefer a 4-week programming postponement, or a bio-based materials scoping alone.

In these three cases, we propose a costed alternative and we put it in writing in the offer. The project succeeds better when the scope matches your asset, not a commercial standard pushed without nuance.

04
Method
  1. Carbon diagnostic
    We measure the footprint of the existing scope via a simplified LCA compliant with current normative standards, inventory reusable furniture and partitions, and build a benchmark across 3 scenarios (conventional, intermediate, high ambition). Deliverable: carbon report and decision matrix in week 2.
  2. Low-carbon programming
    We formalise enforceable quantified objectives with you: target kg CO2/m², furniture reuse rate above 30%, bio-based share above 40%. These objectives are contractualised and drive everything that follows. Deliverable: programming brief in week 4.
  3. Design and sourcing
    We select materials under verified EPDs (INIES database), PEFC or FSC certified timber, wood wool, linoleum, recycled textiles. Our 11 agencies pool reuse sources across ongoing projects. Deliverable: design file and procurement plan in week 8.
  4. Traced implementation
    The works are carried out with documentary traceability of each lot. Our teams consolidate the actual EPDs installed, not just those specified. Deliverable: traced execution file in week 11.
  5. Post-delivery measurement
    We produce the final LCA reporting, build the in-operation certification file according to your ambition, and deliver a consolidated cost-carbon dashboard directly usable by your CFO for the CSRD report. Deliverable: enforceable file in week 12.
05
Frequently asked questions

What is the real additional cost of an eco-designed project vs a conventional one?

When the approach is framed from phase 1, the additional cost generally remains contained below a controlled threshold of the overall budget. Furniture reuse can significantly offset the occasional additional costs of bio-based materials on the supplies line. Beyond phase 1, the additional cost climbs because material decisions become constrained and circular sourcing loses its pooled supply sources. This is why we condition our commitment on scoping from the programming stage, and we put it in writing in the offer.

Does eco-design slow down the schedule?

No on our standard 12-week schedule, provided circular sourcing is anticipated from the programming phase. Our 11 agencies in France and Spain pool reuse sources across ongoing projects, which secures the availability of lots without extending timelines. However, on a compressed schedule under 8 weeks, the reuse rate mechanically drops and we then recommend a lighter approach centred on bio-based materials.

05 — Inspirations

Browse our
projects

Explore Explore

Planning a fit-out project?

Get a complimentary audit of your spaces: an expert eye, concrete recommendations, no commitment.

Request my free audit