Skip to content
Multi-site network architecture — KYTOM
Team Works

Multi-site network architecture

Three interlocking requirements for an EN 50173-compliant architecture

On a multi-site office project, the majority of traffic now heads to the cloud: continuing to size a pure MPLS star topology means funding a 2010 architecture for 2025 usage. A multi-site network architecture combines MPLS, SD-WAN, IPsec VPN and dedicated fibre to interconnect headquarters and branches with controlled latency below 30 ms. Kytom has been designing these infrastructures since 2006 over an average lead time of 12 weeks, including audit, design, category 6A structured cabling and acceptance testing. The EN 50173 and ISO/IEC 11801 standards govern structured cabling, and a well-implemented hybrid SD-WAN significantly reduces the telecoms line item.

Multi-site network architecture
02

A multi-site office architecture meets three simultaneous requirements: service continuity, traffic security and budget control over 5 to 7 years. There are now more than 4 million active companies in France, a growing share of which operate at least 2 physical locations with constant SaaS, ToIP and videoconferencing needs. The bandwidth per office workstation has multiplied several times over in a decade: SaaS, ToIP and videoconferencing needs now bring everyday usage to 5-10 Mbps usable per workstation, compared with 2 Mbps ten years ago.

Legacy MPLS star topologies hit a ceiling against cloud migration (Microsoft 365, hosted ERP), which accounts for a dominant share of outbound traffic on office sites. Our reading diverges here from the operator orthodoxy: routing this traffic through a central MPLS node before exiting to the internet (backhaul architecture) adds 15 to 40 ms of unnecessary latency to each SaaS session and saturates the headquarters link. Local breakout (direct internet access) secured by an NGFW firewall becomes the rule, with MPLS reserved for ToIP and internal application traffic. The GDPR and the French Labour Code also require strict segregation of HR, accounting and guest traffic, supervised via segmented VLANs.

The fibre optic connection runs through a main server room, often on an intermediate floor between R+3 and R+5, then distributes to floor VDI cabinets via OM4 multimode fibre (up to 150 m, 10 Gb/s) or OS2 single-mode fibre (several km, 100 Gb/s+). Compliance with EN 50173 and ISO/IEC 11801 secures the performance measured at acceptance testing.

Multi-site network architecture
03

The Kytom method in 5 milestones over 12 weeks

The Kytom deployment is organised over the standard lead time, structured into five distinct milestones adapted to the scheduling constraints of IT departments.

  1. Technical audit (1 to 2 weeks): mapping of application traffic, measurement of actual throughput, inventory of cabinets, switches and Wi-Fi access points.
  2. Target architecture design (2 to 3 weeks): choice between operator MPLS, managed SD-WAN or hybrid, sizing of primary and backup links, IP addressing plan, VLAN segmentation.
  3. Tender documents and consultation: comparative analysis across at least 3 operator offers, integrators required.
  4. Coordinated deployment (5 to 6 weeks): category 6A or 7 cabling, 42U cabinets, active equipment, centralised supervision.
  5. Technical acceptance (1 to 2 weeks): failover tests, target inter-site latency measurements below 30 ms, training of internal IT teams.

Kytom’s teams spread across the country ensure an on-site presence within 200 km of each client location, bringing intervention times on critical incidents down to 4 working hours on average. Simultaneous coordination across several regions compresses the scheduling timelines on projects of 8 to 15 sites.

For the IT department: the real hidden cost is the missing audit. Multi-site projects that start without a prior throughput/traffic audit almost systematically suffer post-delivery rework, with an additional cost of 15 to 25 % of the VDI budget. Conversely, an audit costed at 8 to 12 k€ excl. VAT in phase 1 secures the budget through to acceptance. An audit is not an expense: it is insurance against re-cabling during operation.

When this method is not the right one. With fewer than 3 interconnected sites and no critical ToIP, the tender + third-party integrator sequence becomes counterproductive: the engineering overhead (12 to 18 k€ excl. VAT) often exceeds the operator savings, and an IPsec VPN connection operated directly by the internal IT department remains more cost-effective. Likewise, on a fleet of fewer than 30 workstations per site and with no hosted business application, managed SD-WAN delivers no measurable ROI before 36 months: prefer a shared operator fibre with a standard router.

04

Comparison of MPLS, SD-WAN and hybrid across 4 key indicators

Finance and IT departments arbitrate between three architecture models depending on application criticality and the traffic profile measured in the audit.

Criterion Pure MPLS Managed SD-WAN Hybrid MPLS + SD-WAN
Recurring cost (base 100) 100 65 to 80 75 to 85
Inter-site latency < 20 ms 20 to 30 ms < 25 ms
Contractual availability 99.9 % 99.5 to 99.9 % 99.9 %
Suited to 5 to 10 sites, critical ToIP 10+ sites, heavy cloud HQ + mixed branches

Indicative values from typical configurations observed in office environments, to be refined according to the audit of your fleet.

On the multi-site projects we deliver, the move to a hybrid SD-WAN generally translates into a significant reduction in the telecoms line item, an improvement in contractual availability and controlled latency across all links, gains that we systematically quantify in the audit before commitment. The return on investment of an SD-WAN overhaul is observed between 18 and 30 months depending on the maturity of the existing setup.

For the IT director facing the executive committee: translate availability into lost hours, not percentages. Announcing « 99.5 % SLA » in a management committee triggers no decision. Announcing « 43 hours of downtime per year, i.e. 5 working days without ToIP or ERP » prompts the decision. The same logic applies to latency: « 30 ms » means nothing, « + 0.5 seconds of delay each time a SharePoint file is opened for 80 employees » is actionable.

Limit of SD-WAN. SD-WAN stops being relevant below 4 connected sites or when cloud traffic remains below 30 % of total traffic: the cost of the managed console and CPE boxes is not amortised, and a residual MPLS or a simple fibre link is enough. On a single site with a few remote workers, the MPLS/SD-WAN debate does not arise: a standard IPsec VPN meets the need for 10 to 20 times less.

05

Four points of vigilance: Arcep, ANSSI and a heterogeneous fleet

Four constraints deserve particular attention before launch, otherwise the go-live may be pushed back by several months.

Vigilance Impact Countermeasure
Arcep dedicated fibre 8 to 26 weeks on 15 to 20 % of office addresses Eligibility study prior to design
ANSSI perimeter security GDPR, IPsec AES-256, 802.1X wired and Wi-Fi Next-generation firewalls
Operator dependency ToIP and ERP criticality in case of a single outage Dual operator on the 3 main sites
Heterogeneous fleet Multi-generation switches, non-standard cabinets Physical audit site by site before tender

Dedicated fibre eligibility remains the number one scheduling risk: a delay of 3 to 6 months is common when the Arcep study has not been carried out beforehand. Perimeter security requires IPsec AES-256, 802.1X authentication on wired and Wi-Fi ports, and GDPR-compliant logging. Operator redundancy on the main sites protects ToIP and ERP continuity against a single outage.

05 — Inspirations

Browse our
projects

Explore Explore

Planning a fit-out project?

Get a complimentary audit of your spaces: an expert eye, concrete recommendations, no commitment.

Request my free audit