Skip to content
Emergency safety lighting (BAES): coordinating 4 critical interfaces — KYTOM
Team Works

Emergency safety lighting (BAES): coordinating 4 critical interfaces

Four critical interfaces to synchronise on tertiary BAES

BAES is not an electrical sub-package, it is a coordination deliverable spanning 4 interfaces: a significant share of on-site rework stems from this work-package confusion. Safety lighting using self-contained emergency luminaires concentrates the most costly non-conformities in tertiary construction precisely because it intersects four trades, electrician, detection, architect, operator, on a single schedule. Since 2006, Kytom has refused to treat it as a technical package in isolation.

Emergency safety lighting (BAES): coordinating 4 critical interfaces
02

Our reading differs from professional practice on this specific point: NF C 71-800 describes a product, not a site organisation. This confusion is what explains the majority of rework. Mastering BAES in tertiary offices rests on four explicit interfaces, each with its deliverable and its validation milestone.

  1. Electricity/SSI: synchronise the normal-emergency power supply with the remote-control signals from the SSI control unit, in compliance with NF C 71-800 (2007 edition) and the applicable regulatory provisions (article R4227-14).
  2. Architect/design office: validate the placement of the luminaires according to suspended-ceiling and escape-route constraints, with a minimum luminous flux of 5 lumens/m² at floor level (article R4227-14) and the additional levels of NF EN 1838 for evacuation lighting.
  3. Site/technical inspection: schedule the acceptance tests and the clearing of reservations from the time of provisional acceptance, without waiting for the safety commission.
  4. Operation/CMMS: integrate the regulatory maintenance logbook (article EC 14 of the ERP order of 25 June 1980 as amended) and the traceability of periodic tests into the client’s CMMS.

The critical trade-off consists in balancing regulatory compliance, architectural readability and ten-year operating cost. On design and build projects, addressing these four interfaces upstream significantly reduces rework during the execution phase.

Emergency safety lighting (BAES): coordinating 4 critical interfaces
03

For the architect: three recurring mistakes that break the lighting intent

For the architect and lighting designer, a poorly coordinated BAES first degrades the project intent: luminaires added during execution in prestige areas, visible penetrations in stretched suspended ceilings, protruding green pictograms at odds with the layout. Three coordination failures regularly compromise BAES projects in tertiary offices.

  • Placement validated during the execution phase: the evacuation-route constraints and the minimum luminous flux are checked only at the time of cable pulling. The result: additional luminaires added, penetrations through already-finished partitions, a significant cost overrun on the electricity package.
  • Remote-control wiring subcontracted as a detail: the 2-wire bus link between BAES and the SSI control unit is treated as a side note in the technical specifications (CCTP). Commissioning tests then reveal standby-mode malfunctions, pushing back the safety commission by 3 to 6 weeks.
  • Undersized maintenance: the maintenance logbook and the training of technical teams are rushed at the end of the project, compromising the traceability of the monthly and half-yearly tests required by article EC 14.

Best practice consists in involving the electrician, the SSI contractor and the architect simultaneously from the detailed design stage (APD), with a BAES layout treated on the same footing as the ambient-luminaire layout.

When this integrated approach is NOT relevant: upstream coordination becomes a disproportionate fixed cost on a single-zone floor below 300 m² with no structuring partitioning, where conventional non-addressable SATI BAES is sufficient. Likewise, for a simple operation to replace worn-out luminaires at the same locations, with no SSI or architectural modification, the integrated procedure is oversized: a one-off audit of the existing installation by an approved inspection body (Apave, Bureau Veritas, Socotec) is more economical.

Emergency safety lighting (BAES): coordinating 4 critical interfaces
04

design and build methodology and measured ratios

Scope limits: these ratios apply to tertiary offices falling under ERP type W, 5th category (threshold of 200 people across all levels), surfaces of 500 to 15,000 m². They do not apply to ERP types L, M or U (dense retail, healthcare establishments) where category A SSI requirements impose a different coordination logic, nor to high-rise (IGH) buildings subject to the order of 30 December 2011, which call for dedicated expertise. The operating savings cited assume a CMMS actually deployed and used by the operator: without a contractual commitment to maintenance, the ten-year gain remains limited.

05

Frequently asked questions

How does Kytom coordinate BAES on a tertiary fit-out project?

Kytom treats BAES as a coordination deliverable, not as an electrical sub-package. This is a reading that departs from the classic CCTP work-package allocation, where BAES remains filed under electrical package 8: in practice, this segmentation regularly generates rework during construction, which upstream coordination makes it possible to avoid. The Kytom 4-step methodology over 12 weeks (cross-referenced regulatory audit, BIM modelling, coordinated scheduling, integrated acceptance) brings this rate below 5%, with a preliminary diagnosis delivered within 5 working days and the contractual coordination of the four interfaces (electricity/SSI, architect, technical inspection, operation/CMMS).

05 — Inspirations

Browse our
projects

Explore Explore

Planning a fit-out project?

Get a complimentary audit of your spaces: an expert eye, concrete recommendations, no commitment.

Request my free audit